Post by guyfromhecker on Mar 22, 2014 15:08:29 GMT -6
Sure some scientists still hold out against evolution. They are scattered throughout the sciences and all have religion as the reason behind their protests. None have been able to puch a credible hole in the theory.
Climate change has many detractors. In fact is, it only enjoys it "overwhelming" support in the climate field. Most of the people working in this field have only been there since the theory was presented. Here are the smoking gun some pull out to "prove" this is a done deal.
Accepted as scientific fact by climatologists:
1) The earth is warming
2) Humans significantly contribute
Read more: morethanweatherstl.proboards.com/thread/37/cosmos?page=2#ixzz2wj8XAcZv
The second question here is the biggie. I watched a special on the Weather channel a couple of years ago. Believe me, they were not looker for doubters here. At the end of the show they asked all the featured scientists about the future. This was pretty much where everyone split. The big splitter was the models. Those who had something to do with making these models had little or no doubt about their accuracy. They predicted continued rapid warming. Those who did not make the models would not come out and endorse these outrageous numbers. They also would not put any specific percentage on what we have caused thus far. As true scientists they held back on these two questions (How much have we caused? How much hotter will it got?), and each one said the same thing. We simply do not know enough at this time to know the answers.
The detractors to the climate change thinge are spread throuhgout the science field. No, they do not all work for Exxon.
Anyhow, evolution is a theory that is akin to fact. We have seen proof of it. No use comparing the two in any way.
Climate change has many detractors. In fact is, it only enjoys it "overwhelming" support in the climate field. Most of the people working in this field have only been there since the theory was presented. Here are the smoking gun some pull out to "prove" this is a done deal.
Accepted as scientific fact by climatologists:
1) The earth is warming
2) Humans significantly contribute
Read more: morethanweatherstl.proboards.com/thread/37/cosmos?page=2#ixzz2wj8XAcZv
The second question here is the biggie. I watched a special on the Weather channel a couple of years ago. Believe me, they were not looker for doubters here. At the end of the show they asked all the featured scientists about the future. This was pretty much where everyone split. The big splitter was the models. Those who had something to do with making these models had little or no doubt about their accuracy. They predicted continued rapid warming. Those who did not make the models would not come out and endorse these outrageous numbers. They also would not put any specific percentage on what we have caused thus far. As true scientists they held back on these two questions (How much have we caused? How much hotter will it got?), and each one said the same thing. We simply do not know enough at this time to know the answers.
The detractors to the climate change thinge are spread throuhgout the science field. No, they do not all work for Exxon.
Anyhow, evolution is a theory that is akin to fact. We have seen proof of it. No use comparing the two in any way.