|
|
Post by mchafin on Jan 8, 2019 13:39:43 GMT -6
Did they update this with 0? I'm not seeing the graphic you displayed. |
|
|
|
Post by addicted2wx - Villa Ridge, Mo on Jan 8, 2019 13:40:42 GMT -6
The euro is free on weather.us. Assuming the image is from there, nothing wrong with that. Yup those are the only shareable images I though we could use and that’s where it came from. Specially sharing the ensemble means is illegal from Pivotal Weather. This storm is really in my opinion looking good for a solid 5-8” event for much of the area. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Higgins on Jan 8, 2019 13:59:52 GMT -6
John Fuller just asked for some wiggle room because of how far away the event is. And then posted a 3-5“ map across most of the area. The public demands numbers early. Wish public forecasters could just say potential for impacts....even low, med, or high impact is more meaningful than numbers that will likely go awry. Now the public could roast him if the storm misses us or gives us 2 to 3 inches of snow instead of 5. I get that the public perceives numbers as useful, but thats because joe public is going to tell his colleague at the water cooler that he heard we are going to get 5 inches of snow. Honestly, even the uncertainty on this forum...we dont know. I guess if we got 25 its not as bad than if we got missed because plans are altered. I will never post specific numbers or even hard and fast ranges at this timeframe. The event does not even begin until Friday night for goodness sake! I almost always start with my over/under type map... 2" or more...3" or more...rarely...4" or more... at this stage of the game. Today...I start with 3" or more. Gives folks an idea of what the minimal impact could be...but doesn't throw out the super high fantasy (or at least potential fantasy) numbers in the double digits. |
|
